Saxe as an Erosion of Individual Protections: A Response to Colitti
Colitti asserts the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's decision in Saxe v. State College Area School District[1] (2001) maligned a Pennsylvania public school board's well-intended anti-harassment policy, thereby denying 'constitutional protection to minority groups, especially gays.' Colitti's analysis reflects a misguided understanding of the federal judiciary's duty to interpret and apply the U.S. Constitution and a myopic perspective of the Saxe opinion.
Object Details
Creators/Contributors
Crawford, Jon G. - author
Collection
collections Journal of Educational Controversy | Peer-reviewed Journals
Identifier
1012
Date Issued
January 1st, 2006
Language
Resource type
Subject Topics
- Educational law and legislation--United States
- Students--Legal status
- laws
- etc.--United States
- School management and organization--United States
- Education--Moral and ethical aspects--United States
- Minorities--Civil rights--United States