Evaluating Automated Accessibility Checker Tools
The internet has grown into a tool that is essential for communication, education, and commerce. However, for those with disabilities, web content can often have significant barriers if it is not designed with accessibility in mind. Digital accessibility ensures that websites and applications are usable by everyone, regardless of ability. In order to make sure web content complies with accessibility standards, automated accessibility evaluation tools have grown in significance. This paper investigates the effectiveness of automated accessibility evaluation tools (AAETs) for identifying web accessibility issues. The research analyzed five prominent AAETs: Accessibility Insights, aXe DevTools, Lighthouse, SiteImprove, and WAVE and tested them against four popular news websites and one local news site. The paper introduced a weighted coverage error ratio (CER) metric which benefits from all issues found regardless of accuracy. After analyzing the results, WAVE was the most effective tool in the scope of this paper if only by a small margin. Ultimately, the best way to evaluate accessibility is to use a combination of the tools and incorporate manual testing.
Object Details
Creators/Contributors
- Nguyen, Thai - author
- O'Hara, Dustin - thesis advisor
Collection
Identifier
1792
Date Issued
April 1st, 2024
Language
Resource type
Access conditions
Copying of this document in whole or in part is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this document for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without the author's written permission.
Subject Topics
- accessibility evaluation
- WCAG 2.0
- web accessibility evaluation
- web accessibility evaluation tools
- automatic tools comparisons
- accessibility
- WAVE
- SiteImprove